Reading English case law can be fun: even the judges resource to the typical British dark humour and mockery while addressing cases. Do you want an example?
Merchandising Corporation of America Inc. and Others v Harpbond Ltd. and Others
[1983] F.S.R. 32
"This is an appeal by the plaintiffs against an order of Walton J. made on 25 November 1981, whereby he granted the plaintiffs some interlocutory relief by way of injunctions. But the plaintiffs, like Oliver Twist, have asked for more and, like Oliver Twist, they are not going to get it.
The appeal centres round what seems to me to be a novel and starting proposition, that there can be copyright in unusual facial make-up. Perhaps it is a sign of the times that it does not arise connection with women's make up but in connection with the make-up which he uses in the course of his performances as a pop star and in the publicity material with which he advertises himself to what no doubt is his adoring public.
(...)
It seemed to me, right at the beginning of Mr. Wilson's submissions (and I want to be restrained in my language), that it was fantastic to suggest that make-up on anyone's face could possibly be a painting."
Yeah, I am studying... a lot...